Main page › Guides › Valuation and resale

Valuation and resale of modular homes

From Modular Living Australia — the independent knowledge base Last updated: 8 Oct 2026

The resale position of a modular home turns mainly on tenure, whether the land is owned or leased, and no independent resale data for modular homes in Australia was located.^[1] In a New South Wales land lease community the resident owns the home but leases the land, and a home there can be sold with no deferred management or exit fees, although the operator must approve the buyer.^[1][3]

The question people usually ask is whether modular homes hold their value. It is the wrong first question. In Australia the resale position of a factory-built home is determined far more by tenure — what you legally own — than by whether the walls were assembled in a factory or on the block. Two homes of identical construction can behave completely differently on resale: one is real property sold like any house, the other is a chattel on someone else's land, sold under a separate statutory regime with the operator's involvement. This guide sets out that distinction, what each path involves, and what the available Australian evidence does and does not support.

The distinction that decides everything §

A modular home permanently affixed to land you own is part of the land. It is sold with the title, valued against comparable sales in the area, and financed by ordinary mortgage lending.

A home on a leased site is not. The NSW Government describes the arrangement plainly: in a land lease community the resident owns the home but leases the land it sits on from the community operator, paying site fees for the right to occupy the site^[1]. More than 35,000 people live in over 500 such communities in New South Wales^[2].

That is a substantial share of the factory-built housing stock in Australia, and it is where most published claims about relocatable homes "depreciating" originate. The mechanism is not that factory construction is inferior; it is that the buyer owns a building without owning appreciating land beneath it, and the ongoing site fee is a liability the next buyer inherits.

Background on the communities themselves is at Land lease communities and manufactured home estates.

Selling a home on a leased site: New South Wales §

In New South Wales the homeowner decides how to sell — privately or through an agent. Industry information for the sector states that no deferred management or exit fees are payable, unlike many retirement villages, and that the owner retains any capital gain. The park operator must approve the purchaser, but cannot unreasonably withhold consent to the sale and to the granting of a new site agreement^[3].

Two things follow. The absence of an exit fee is a genuine advantage over the retirement village model. But the operator's approval right, and the site fee the incoming buyer will face, both sit inside the transaction in a way they never do on a freehold sale.

Selling a home on a leased site: Queensland §

Queensland regulates the sale more heavily. Pre-contractual disclosure obligations apply, including a residential park comparison document and disclosure of the site rent the new home owner will be required to pay under the site agreement for that site^[5].

The Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Amendment Act 2024 added an opt-in scheme addressing the practical problem of homes that will not sell. Under it a park owner must purchase an eligible home that remains unsold at an agreed buyback amount, with the parties required to agree a resale value within set periods and, failing agreement, to jointly appoint a registered valuer to value the home^[4].

Reporting on the reforms describes them as applying across 203 residential land lease communities covering 25,513 sites, limiting site rent increases to the higher of CPI or 3.5 per cent, with the new site agreement and re-sale processes taking effect from 6 December 2025^[6].

The site rent cap is relevant to resale even though it is not a resale rule: the predictability of the ongoing fee is one of the things an incoming buyer is pricing.

Freehold land: what a valuer is actually valuing §

Where the home is fixed to land held on ordinary title, the valuation exercise is the standard one — comparable sales of similar dwellings in the locality, adjusted for size, condition, specification and land. Nothing in that process has a modular category. A completed, code-compliant module-built house presents to a valuer as a house.

That is the basis for the claim, common in builder marketing, that modular homes achieve resale value comparable to site-built homes particularly where they are indistinguishable from traditionally built houses^[7]. The reasoning is sound; the evidence offered for it is not independent, and the qualifier "indistinguishable" is doing significant work. Homes with an unusual footprint, visible module joins, a non-standard external appearance or a small floor area in an area of large houses will be compared against a thinner set of comparable sales, which is a valuation risk independent of construction quality.

What is not established §

No independent Australian dataset comparing resale prices, holding periods or valuation outcomes for modular and site-built homes has been located for this guide. Every Australian source located that asserts comparable resale performance is published by a builder or a directory with a commercial interest in the sector.

Overseas appraisal literature on factory-built housing does exist, but it operates within different title, classification and mortgage systems, and this site does not treat conclusions drawn under those systems as evidence about Australian outcomes. That comparison is not covered by the sources compiled here.

What can be said without a dataset is narrower and still useful: the tenure distinction in the sections above is established in Australian legislation and regulator material, and it is a larger determinant of resale outcome than construction method.

What documentation does at sale §

The Australian Building Codes Board's handbook makes the point that evidence of suitability for off-site work and for elements concealed once modules are joined has to be planned into the process rather than assembled after the fact^[8].

The resale consequence appears years later. A purchaser's building inspector or a lender's valuer encountering a factory-built home with a complete set of approvals, engineering documentation, energy certificates, factory inspection records and occupancy documentation is in a straightforward position. The same house with a missing paper trail invites the discount that gets applied whenever a valuer is uncertain. Keeping the handover pack intact is one of the few resale variables entirely within the owner's control.

Practical questions before buying §

• Will the home be fixed to land I own on ordinary title, or placed on a leased site?
• If leased: what are the current site fees, how can they be increased, and what does the disclosure document say?
• If leased: what does the site agreement require on sale, and what approval right does the operator hold?
• Is the design close enough to conventional housing in the area to have a usable set of comparable sales?
• What documentation will I hold at handover, and will it survive to a future sale?

References §