Main page › Guides › Tasmania modular finance guarantee

Tasmania drafts a state guarantee for loans on homes still in the factory

From Modular Living Australia — the independent knowledge base Last updated: 4 Sep 2026

Tasmania has released a draft Bill that would let the state government guarantee part of a construction loan while a modular home is still being assembled inside a factory. The Modular Housing Finance Guarantee is aimed at a specific and well-documented problem: for most of the build period there is nothing standing on the buyer's block, so the lender has no completed structure to take as security.

It is a draft. The consultation closed on 4 September 2026 and no scheme is open to borrowers.

What the problem is §

On a conventional build, value accumulates on the land in stages. Each progress payment leaves behind footings, a frame, a roof — things a valuer can inspect and a lender can secure a mortgage against. Off-site construction breaks that pattern. Most of the money is spent while the home is a chattel sitting on a factory floor, owned by the manufacturer, on land the buyer has no interest in.

Tasmania's stated rationale for the guarantee is exactly this gap. The government's position is that access to finance, rather than the build itself, is the binding constraint on modular housing^[1]. The same constraint is what CommBank's assessed-manufacturer arrangements and Keystart's Western Australian product were each built to work around, from the lender side rather than the government side — both are covered separately on this site.

What the draft would do §

The mechanism described in the government's announcement is a tapering guarantee. The state would partner with lenders to guarantee a portion of construction finance during the off-site phase. The guarantee would reduce as construction progresses and cease entirely once the home is installed and becomes standard mortgage security^[1].

The announcement also set out two stated safeguards: eligibility limited to approved lenders, and to accredited Tasmanian builders^[1].

A later release added a qualifying condition on the dwelling itself. To fall within the scheme, a home would have to be manufactured off-site in a factory, then transported and permanently affixed to land^[3].

What the Bill does not do §

This is the part most likely to be misread. The draft Bill is an enabling framework. Treasury's consultation material states plainly that the operational matters — eligibility criteria, guarantee limits, and other scheme requirements — are intended to be dealt with through regulations and associated scheme documentation, and that the supporting regulations and the Deed of Guarantee were still being developed at the time of consultation^[2].

In practice that means the questions a buyer would actually ask are all unanswered in the published material:

• How much of the loan would be guaranteed, and up to what dollar ceiling.
• Which lenders would participate. Industry reporting at the time of release noted that guarantee limits and participating lenders had not been announced and that discussions with banks were continuing^[4].
• What "accredited Tasmanian builder" would mean in practice, and whether an interstate manufacturer delivering into Tasmania could qualify.
• Whether there would be a property value cap, an owner-occupier requirement, or a first-home-buyer restriction.

Timing §

The initiative was announced on 3 June 2026, with the government stating it would work with industry and lenders to introduce legislation in the August sitting^[1]. The draft Bill was subsequently released for public consultation, with submissions closing at close of business on 4 September 2026^[2]. The government's stated target was enactment in the final quarter of 2026^[3].

A stated target is not a commencement date. Even if the Bill passes on that timetable, the scheme could not operate until the regulations and the Deed of Guarantee are made and lenders sign up. Readers planning a Tasmanian modular build in the next twelve months should not assume this will be available to them.

What it would change for a buyer, if it proceeds §

Assuming the scheme is enacted and regulations follow, the practical effect would be narrow but real. It would not reduce the price of a home, provide a grant, or change planning approval. It would address one thing: whether a lender is willing to release funds during the factory phase at all.

That matters because the current alternatives are unattractive. Buyers commonly either fund the factory stage from savings, use a builder who carries the cost until delivery and prices that risk in, or restrict themselves to the handful of lenders with a specific off-site product.

The condition that the home be permanently affixed to land^[3] also draws a line that readers should notice. A dwelling that stays a chattel — a tiny home on wheels, a home in a land lease community where the resident does not own the land — does not obviously sit inside that description. The published material does not address those cases.

What is not covered here §

• The text of the draft Bill. This page describes what the government and Treasury have published about the scheme's intent. It is not a clause-by-clause analysis, and the Bill may change before introduction.
• Eligibility. No eligibility criteria have been published^[2]. Any figure or rule you see elsewhere describing who qualifies is not sourced from the Tasmanian Government material compiled here.
• Whether it will pass. The final quarter of 2026 is a stated target^[3], not an outcome.
• Other states. No equivalent state guarantee for the off-site construction phase was identified in the sources compiled here. Lender-side arrangements in other jurisdictions are covered separately.
• Whether any lender will lend to you. A government guarantee to a lender is not a commitment by that lender to approve a loan.

This page will be updated if the Bill is introduced, if it passes, or if regulations are made.

References §