Main page › Guides › Transportable finance

Financing a transportable home

From Modular Living Australia — the independent knowledge base Last updated: 31 Jul 2026

A lender looking at a transportable home is not asking what it looks like or how well it is built. It is asking one question: if this loan fails, what can be recovered, and is the dwelling part of it? The answer turns on a distinction that predates modular housing by centuries — fixture or chattel — and everything about the available finance follows from it.

Fixture or chattel §

The National Construction Code sets the build standards for relocatable and manufactured homes, but how a dwelling is built and fixed is what a valuer and a lender weigh when deciding which side of the line it falls on^[1].

The rule of thumb applied in Australian lending is physical. A slab-founded, plumbed dwelling usually reads as a fixture that has become part of the property. A relocatable or manufactured home delivered on a chassis or sitting on piers reads more like a moveable chattel. That classification decides whether the dwelling is captured inside the land security or has to be secured separately^[1].

Two consequences follow immediately.

The first is that the same building can be either, depending on how it is installed. A decision made for cost reasons at the footing stage — piers instead of a slab, quick-release connections instead of hard plumbing — can move the home out of the land security and into a different, more expensive finance category. That is worth knowing before the footing design is settled rather than after.

The second is that "it's relocatable" is a selling point to a buyer and a problem to a lender. The mobility that makes the product attractive is precisely what weakens it as security.

Which product follows §

Australian financing for these dwellings falls into three categories: construction loans, chattel mortgages, and standard residential mortgages — with the choice depending on whether the building is sited permanently or remains relocatable, and the asset classified as chattel or real property depending on foundation permanence. Council zoning, bushfire attack level ratings and foundation permanence together determine whether the asset qualifies for standard mortgage terms or for chattel finance^[2].

What does not exist is a dedicated product. There is no loan written specifically for movable dwellings in Australia; finance is unsecured personal lending, occasionally asset or chattel finance where the structure can serve as security, or a land-backed home or construction loan where the dwelling is fixed to land the borrower owns or is buying^[3].

Fixed to land you own §

This is the straightforward case and the cheapest money.

Where the dwelling is fixed and the land is owned, the routes are the ordinary ones: accessing existing equity through a line of credit or cash-out, or a construction loan under which the total is released in progress draws through the construction stages^[4].

Construction lending brings its usual conditions. Lenders usually fund 70 to 80 per cent of total project cost, generally require a quantity surveyor's report and full council-approved plans before approval, and will not formally value the dwelling until it is complete; loan-to-value ratios for construction are more conservative than for an established property purchase^[5].

Because a lender may require proof of total funds available^[2], the structure-price-versus-project-price gap discussed in What transportable homes cost is not just a budgeting issue — a shortfall between the two can stop an application.

In a park: the hard case §

Where the home sits on a site rented from a park owner, the security position is at its weakest, and the reason is published by a state government rather than inferred here.

The Queensland disclosure form states that the home owner will not own the land the manufactured home is positioned on, and that in some circumstances the site agreement may be terminated — where the home owner may be required to remove the home from the park or transfer ownership of it to the park owner^[6].

A lender reading that is being asked to take security over an asset that sits on land controlled by a third party, under an agreement that can end, with an outcome that may include the asset being transferred to that third party. Lenders separate the question of income from the question of security precisely because they answer different things^[1], and here the security question is genuinely difficult.

This site has not located Australian lender policy material describing what products are actually available to a resident buying a home in a land lease community. That gap is real and is stated rather than filled. Anyone in this position should approach a broker experienced with residential parks, and should ask specifically what happens to the loan if the site agreement ends.

A warning about the sources you will find §

Searching for information on financing a relocatable or manufactured home returns a large volume of material describing chattel loans in detail — terms, deposits, rate expectations, program names.

Almost all of it is American. References to FHA Title I and Title II, VA loans, private mortgage insurance and lending "in all 50 states" describe a system of government-backed manufactured housing finance that has no Australian equivalent. Deposit percentages, loan terms and rate expectations quoted in that material are not transferable, and this guide does not reproduce them.

The Australian position is narrower and less generous: no dedicated product, no government-backed program for this asset class located here, and a classification test that decides everything. Treat overseas material as describing a different country's market, because it is.

What is not covered here §

Interest rates, deposit requirements and lender names are deliberately omitted. Individual lender policy on relocatable dwellings, on homes in residential parks, and on dwellings not permanently affixed is not covered by the sources compiled here, and is the single most useful thing to establish early with a broker.

Also not covered: insurance requirements attached to finance; the treatment of a transportable home already owned and being relocated; and the tax position, which is dealt with generally in Granny flats, tax and Centrelink for secondary dwellings and should otherwise be taken to a registered tax agent.

References §