Main page › Guides › TAS, ACT and NT rules

Transportable home rules in Tasmania, the ACT and the Northern Territory

From Modular Living Australia — the independent knowledge base Last updated: 8 Oct 2026

In the Northern Territory, caravan park residents are covered by the Caravan Parks Act 2012, with three months' notice to terminate a periodic agreement and 42 days to end a fixed-period one.^[2][3] In Tasmania, a 2024 government paper found that park rules are not regulated and can be changed without consulting residents, and in the ACT occupancy agreements apply, which carry fewer rules than residential tenancy agreements.^[1][4]

The three smallest jurisdictions are grouped here because the publicly available material for each is too thin to support a separate guide. The Northern Territory has its own dedicated Act and clear government guidance. Tasmania has a government paper that identifies a specific gap in resident protections. The Australian Capital Territory has very little, and this guide says so rather than filling the space.

Tasmania §

A Tasmanian Government discussion paper published in August 2024 sets out the history and the current position. It records that long-term residency in caravan parks was permitted, that standards were established for the construction, maintenance and operation of caravan parks and movable dwellings, and that improved forms of movable dwellings — including relocatable chassis-built homes — were provided for^[1].

The paper also identifies a gap that matters more than any of that background.

In Tasmania the park rule-making process is not subject to any regulation. Park rules do not require the approval of park residents, and they are not screened by a government regulator. In other Australian jurisdictions park rules generally form part of the tenancy or site agreement; changing them requires formal notice and a consultation period during which residents may challenge the fairness or lawfulness of a proposed rule, and a copy of the park rules must generally be provided to a prospective tenant before they sign^[1].

For anyone considering a Tasmanian park, that is the single most important thing on this page. The rules governing daily life in the park can be made and changed by the operator without resident approval and without regulatory scrutiny, and — unlike elsewhere — there is no requirement described here that a copy be provided before signing. Ask for the current rules in writing, and ask what the process is for changing them, before committing.

The paper was published to consider reform. That means two things: the position described is the position as at August 2024, and it may have changed since. Confirm the current law with Consumer, Building and Occupational Services or a Tasmanian lawyer.

Northern Territory §

The Northern Territory has a dedicated statute. The Caravan Parks Act 2012 sets out the rights and responsibilities of caravan park landlords and residents, establishes standards for habitation, maintenance and repairs to caravan residences, and provides enforcement mechanisms for both parties. A caravan park is an area of land containing a complex of caravan sites, and a resident has a right of occupancy through an agreement with the park owner^[3].

The occupancy agreement is the operative document. It covers matters including rent increases, how long residents can stay, and security deposits. An operator may write their own agreement or use the default caravan park rent agreement; there is no single required format, but an agreement cannot exclude any of the rights and responsibilities set out in the Caravan Parks Act 2012. A written agreement is only legally binding once both parties have signed, and the default occupancy agreement — which contains all the rights and responsibilities under the Act — applies where a verbal agreement exists and no written agreement has been made^[2].

That last provision is unusually protective. A resident on a handshake arrangement is not without rights; the statutory default fills the gap.

Notice periods are prescribed and cannot be contracted around. Park operators must provide three months notice to terminate periodic occupancy arrangements, and 42 days notice to end fixed-period agreements. Different notice periods apply during emergencies such as floods or fires. These are minimum statutory requirements that cannot be shortened, and failure to give proper notice can invalidate a termination^[3].

Separately, the Residential Tenancies Act 1999 defines residential premises to include a caravan intended for occupation as a place of residence, and provides for a Civil and Administrative Tribunal^[5]. Which Act applies to a particular arrangement is a question worth resolving early, because the two provide different pathways.

Australian Capital Territory §

There is very little publicly available material, and this guide will not invent it.

The ACT uses occupancy agreements for accommodation types that do not fit the residential tenancy model. Occupancy agreements have fewer rules than residential tenancy agreements, which allows them to be used more flexibly, and the types of accommodation that may involve them include caravan and manufactured home parks^[4].

Beyond that, the only substantive ACT material located for this guide is a consultation page describing a public exposure draft tabled in November 2019. That draft proposed clarifying the difference between an occupancy agreement and a residential tenancy agreement, making the occupancy principles in the Residential Tenancies Act mandatory, clarifying what happens when a person who owns a dwelling on a site in a residential park wishes to transfer their rights and responsibilities under an occupancy agreement, and introducing rules about abandoned belongings in caravan and manufactured home parks^[4].

Those were proposals in 2019. This site has not located a source confirming what was enacted or what the current ACT position is, and does not assume that a tabled draft became law. Anyone dealing with a transportable dwelling in an ACT park should treat Access Canberra and the current Residential Tenancies Act as the starting point rather than anything on this page.

The one point that can be carried forward with confidence is the structural one: an occupancy agreement is a weaker instrument than a residential tenancy agreement by design^[4]. Knowing which one is being offered is the first question to ask.

What is not covered here §

No Tasmanian, ACT or Northern Territory material on the approval pathway for a transportable dwelling on ordinary private land — as distinct from in a park — has been located for this guide. Building and planning approval in each jurisdiction is a matter for the local council or, in the ACT, the territory planning system.

Also not covered by the sources compiled here: bond and security deposit rules; dispute resolution procedure in each jurisdiction; the sale or transfer of a dwelling in a Tasmanian or Northern Territory park; construction standards for movable dwellings in Tasmania and the Northern Territory; and whether any of the 2019 ACT proposals were enacted.

References §